Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Invisible Man

Tony Cheng
GSI Tara Phillips (Fri. 9-10)
Comparative Literature 60AC
18 November 2016
Invisible Man
In Invisible Man, Ralph Ellison addressed many issues that African-Americans faced in the early twentieth century such as individuality and identity. The narrator begins telling his story claiming that he is an “invisible man” in the sense that people refuse to see him for himself and instead people only see his skin color. He is not his own person, but is instead only a black man in society’s eyes. Throughout the novel the narrator finds himself exploited countless times because of his complexion and his frustration with society’s image of him is what fuels his desire to find his place in society, something that is seen across other modernist texts.
The theme of identity pervades much of the novel, most notably with Rineheart, a mysterious character the narrator is mistaken for when in disguise. The narrator finds that Rineheart leads many lives, each depending on who he is interacting with. Rineheart is a bookie to some, a preacher to others, and has many other identities. The narrator finds that Rineheart is a window into his thoughts in the sense that unlike himself who struggles to find his identity, Rineheart has many. His fluid character is a freedom in a sense, but his fluidity also results in a loss of individuality. The flexibility of Rineheart’s identity is reminiscent of Clare’s double life in Nella Larsen’s Passing. Clare’s passing lets her live life as a white woman, while secreting frequenting Harlem to visit her black heritage. Her identity changes from person to person like Rineheart as she morphs from a seemingly racist white woman to one who spends her free time with the black community.
The narrator also continually finds himself exploited by society for his skin color from the battle royal where he was pit to fight against other black students for entertainment, to the Brotherhood, who used him as the face of their movement because of his black skin. The narrator is only seen by society as another black man, regardless of how capable or unique he is. This is also seen in Zora Neale Hurston’s Their Eyes Were Watching God where Mrs. Turner “didn’t cling to Janie Woods the woman. She paid homage to Janie’s Caucasian characteristics as such” (Hurston 145). Both Janie and the narrator are treated as stereotypes, unable to climb the social ladder or make a name for themselves.
            Ellison, in part, utilized W. E. B. Du Bois’s concept of double consciousness where one’s identity is “divided into several parts, making it difficult … to have one unified identity” (Understanding). In the racial context used by Du Bois and Ellison, double consciousness meant that black Americans cannot have “one unified identity” and must instead view themselves as they might be by the “white” world and from their own perspectives. The black experience was shaped from having to account for society’s anti-black sentiments. Invisible Man shows the journey of a naive man learning that he must also account for society’s view of him, that he is burdened with a responsibility unique to the black community.

Discussion Question:
Is it possible to remain true to both one's communal self and one's individual self?



Works Cited
Ellison, Ralph. Invisible Man. New York: Vintage International, 1995. Print
Gotfrd, Bernard. Ellison. Digital image. Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., n.d. Web. 16 Nov. 2016
Hurston, Zora Neale. Their Eyes Were Watching God. New York: First Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2006. Print.
“Understanding W.E.B. Du Boi’s Concept of Double Consciousness.” Kristin Does Theory. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Nov. 2016

5 comments:

  1. A person's identity has multiple faces, but when society superficially categorizes people using only one part of their identity, people struggle with highlighting other parts of their identity. The struggles within a person or between the person and society can lead to domination of one side over the other.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice post! You raise a very important philosophical question about how much our identities are shaped by the community around us. I think this also speaks to the questions brought up by John Dos Passos in The 42nd Parallel. Eleanor, Mac, and especially Ward arguably allow their identities to be completely shaped by their positions only relative to the rest of society. While Dos Passos misses the connection to race that the other authors discuss, I think you are pointing to a question that affects every community.

    ReplyDelete
  3. An individual with multiple identities and an individual with multiple selves are things I am very interested in. In a world where there was a collective outside, and a multitude of individuality inside, the interaction between the interiority and exteriority is something that we are constantly looking for. It is through this process that we eventually find enlightenment regarding what particular aspect of humanity the author is trying to accentuate.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think the question you pose is a very interesting one and one that all of us should think about. The line between who we are and who society makes us to be is blurred; even if we fight against society's pressures on our identity and form our identity being aware of society's pressures, then aren't we still forming our identity based on our environment? Can we ever separate our true identity from one that society has molded for us? Personally I believe that even our truest selves are deeply affected by societal norms and the environment we expose ourselves to.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think your question ties in well to the modernist movement particularly because of how often the theme of identity and finding oneself is explored in modernist literature. I think the answer to the question is linked to the contrast between the crowd and the individual, because characters like the narrator of Invisible Man or Clare from Passing are stuck between how others perceive them and how they want to be perceived. In that respect, different authors seem to come to different conclusions about whether or not the individual really matters when compared to the masses.

    ReplyDelete