Potential Power in Avant-Garde Poetry
Nicole Huddleston
GSI Tara Phillips
Comparative Literature
60AC
21 October 2016
Potential Power in Avant-Garde Poetry
The literary avant-garde movement was characterized by
writers pushing the boundaries of tradition not only in the form of their
writings but also in subject matter. A significant amount of poetry existed
within the avant-garde to directly address social and political issues of the
time. Perhaps one of the most notable contributors to this movement worldwide
is poet and political activist Pablo Neruda who began his post as Chilean
consul in Spain in 1934, two years before the Spanish Civil War. As one of the
last international leftist crises in the world, the Spanish Civil War had an
impressive impact on the writers of the avant-garde movement who closely
related themselves with the politics of the time.
The avant-garde movement stressed political awareness and
the Spanish Civil war impacted the literature and writers of the United States
as well as those of Latin America. This
willingness of Americans to go fight in the Spanish Civil War is perhaps most
evident in the Abraham Lincoln Brigade which was a group of over “2800 American
volunteers who went to Spain in the late 1930s to fight fascism in violation of
United States Neutrality Laws” (Carroll par. 1) These fighters served under the
Spanish Republic Army.
Pablo Neruda had strong leftist political preferences,
which were further explored through his poetry when he arrived in Spain in 1934
surrounded by fellow avant-garde writers such as Federico Garcia Lorca and
Rafael Alberti. This drive to explore political issues through the art of
poetry inspired writers of the avant-garde, and his poem “Explico algunas
cosas” or “I’m Explaining a Few Things” was in response to the Spanish Civil
War. The war, spanning from 1936-1939 was a military revolt between the
Loyalist Republicans of Spain and the fascist Nationalists. In Neruda’s poem,
he “expresses his outrage against fascist forces” (Frontline 1).
The power of the poem comes from the form and imagery
utilized. Throughout the poem, Neruda directly addresses the readers with
questions such as “You are going to ask: and where are the lilacs/ and the
poppy-petalled metaphysics?” (Line 1), “Federico, do you remember/ from under
the ground/ where the light of June drowned flowers in your mouth?” (Line 20-23)
and “And you will ask: why doesn’t his poetry/ speak of dreams and leaves/ and
the great volcanoes of his native land?” (Lines 72-74) His questions point out
the change that was induced in Spain by the atrocities of the Spanish Civil War
and relate a sense of personal investment and despair. He even mentions his
fellow poets like Rafael Alberti and Federico Garcia Lorca-who was killed in
the Spanish Civil War.
The imagery used in “Explico algunas cosas” is another
aspect of the poems form that delivers a powerful message. Neruda starts his
poem with images of how Spain was before the war. Lofty and beautiful images
such as “a suburb of Madrid, with bells, / and clocks and trees.” (Lines 7-9),
“the house of flowers” (Line 14), and “good-looking house/ with its dogs and
children.” (Lines 16-17) appear. This is later juxtaposed with the powerful
imagery of fire and blood: “And one morning all that was burning… leapt out of
the earth / devouring human beings-” (Lines 40-44), and “see the blood in the
streets.” (Line 75) Such images are repeated throughout the poem to stress the
brutality and realities of the war. Neruda’s “poems were never intended to be
merely script or signs on a printed page but were to be uttered and declaimed
in order to elicit a response.” (Frontline 1) The poem is an example of
avant-garde poetry and its political subject matter meant to make a formidable
statement in society.
Discussion Questions:
1. “Explico
algunas cosas” made a significant statement in society not just as a poem but in
the realm of politics. How does a poem about an event like the Spanish Civil
War give emphasis to the event itself versus a more factual depiction of an
event in mediums such as newspapers and Newsreels? Does it make a stronger
impact?
2. The form of “Explico algunas cosas” utilizes
repetition in certain stanzas to emphasize imagery like “the blood in the
streets” (Line 75, 77, 78) as well as allusions to the atrocities of the
Spanish Civil War. How does the form manifest itself into an impact for the
poem, which is strong enough to induce a response for the people suffering and
those watching what went on in the Spanish Civil War and its consequences?
Work Cited
Carroll, Peter.
"Psychology & Ideology In The Spanish Civil War: The Case Of The
Abraham Lincoln Brigade."
Antioch Review 52.2 (1994): 219. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17 Oct. 2016.
Fountain, James.
"The Notion Of Crusade In British And American Literary Responses To The Spanish Civil War." Journal Of
Transatlantic Studies (Routledge) 7.2 (2009): 133-147. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17 Oct. 2016.
Maurya, Vibha, and Vijaya
Kataraman. "The People's Poet." The People's Poet. Frontline Magazine, Aug. 2004. Web. 18 Oct.
2016.
Neruda, Pablo. "I’M
EXPLAINING A FEW THINGS (poem) - Pablo Neruda - Chile - Poetry International." I’M EXPLAINING A FEW
THINGS (poem) - Pablo Neruda - Chile -Poetry International. N.p., n.d. Web. 18
Oct. 2016.
Pablo, Neruda. “Pablo
Neruda recita Explico Algunas Cosas.” Youtube,
uploaded by Poemas del alma, 11
April 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzgmSsyEgtk.
"Pablo Neruda."
Poetry Foundation. Poetry Foundation, n.d. Web. 18 Oct. 2016.
"Stars In His
Eyes." Commentary 141.7 (2016): 1-3. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17
Oct. 2016.
Your post was completely relevant and written beautifully. You did a great job interweaving the historical and the modernist.
ReplyDeleteAs we are currently seeing with Lorca, avant garde was an emerging form of expression in the early 1900's, and one that openly criticized the superficiality of American culture. Many, like Lorca's Coney Island piece, or his King of Harlem poem, use vivid and violent imagery like blood to evoke the reader out of the passage and into a strong emotional reaction. As you stated, such “poems were never intended to be merely script or signs on a printed page but were to be uttered and declaimed in order to elicit a response.” Furthermore, it calls attention to global disorder present in the other Americas that could be hidden underneath the lights and glowing industry in the USA.
After reading your post I can totally understand this link between avant-garde poetry/modernism and the Spanish civil war. It makes sense that they were pushing the boundaries of tradition and trying to find a new way to express the atrocities they had witnessed and horrors they'd experienced.
ReplyDeleteI think the answer to your first discussion questions is a broader statement about art works in general. I believe that art, especially depictions of politically-charged events, are much more impactful than a news story. Art has a way of evoking deep emotions an appealing to us in a way still unclear. I believe that it is because of this that Neruda's imagery-filled poem is so celebrated.
ReplyDeleteTo answer your first question, I believe that a more factual description can distance the reader from the event itself. It takes more for a person to more fully immerse themselves in a situation than just facts and statements. A poem, like Neruda's, can definitely provide a more complete view and understanding of what it is describing. Poetic elements, like imagery, add another level onto what the reader feels and imagines.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Tony and Claire that other mediums besides the factual reports of the news can help connect the audience more effectively to an event emotionally. Raw emotion or sympathy isn't something that is supposed to be a part of unbiased news, so different perspectives or techniques can really help to convey certain messages to the audience.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate your connection of the avant-garde movement to the political events that's happening at the time. To answer your discussion questions, I think definitely the poem is another way of representing the reality compared to the newspapers. It takes on a more subtle approach because it mixes the writer's emotions and mood that aren't easily articulated as the other media do.
ReplyDeleteI think this blog post relates a lot to the 42nd Parallel because Dos Passos chose to write about history in a unique and artistic way. Similarly, Pablo Neruda, in response to your first question, is able to create a more deep understanding of political events such as the Spanish Civil war by bringing the reader closer to the event. His poems make it impossible to sweep the Spanish Civil war under the carpet, like historical pieces and newspapers often are able to do.
ReplyDeleteIn response to your first question, I definitely think there are ways in which poetry and art can be more impactful than a factual retelling, and I think that relates to your second question in that poetry can utilize elements such as repetition and imagery to create an effect. While a factual work might lack the rhetorical devices that evoke emotion in art, poetry makes use of them to the fullest.
ReplyDeleteWhen we read about tragedy in the news, everything seems to be dehumanized. I rarely find myself feeling emotional when I watch the news. However, a book and especially a poem can touch me deeply in ways that a news article or report never could. I think this poem is a perfect representation of that. When we listen to the news, somebody takes the information and molds it into a specific format and just dictates it to us. When I read this poem, I hear the story from somebody who knows what it is like to actually feel and see the effects of the tragedy. It is much like hearing about a terrible war in class or the news versus asking your grandfather to tell you stories about what it was like to be in the war, to experience it. I have learned about the Spanish Civil War in my time at Cal, but reading this poem gave me chills and make me empathize with the voice speaking in the poem, the voice that seems to have known and experienced the devastation. Reading poetry and literature is a personal, passionate and emotional experience that can convey events and emotions in ways that journalism cannot.
ReplyDeleteI'd just like to point out that some videos show a dramatic reinterpretation of "algunas..." that actually put a melancholy twist on it.
ReplyDeleteI'd say repetition is highly important for painting an image of a horrific action or event - it's just the simple principle that if you say it enough times, the audience will begin to visualize the specific details without much interpretation. In a way, it's sort of the opposite of Dos Passos' idea of giving just enough to picture an event, but nonetheless both techniques draw the reader in and encourage usage of the senses.
I agree with what's been said before - that news has a tendency to distance the reader from real events, and dehumanize the people involved in tragedy. Therefore, poetry is an alternative form of communication that better expresses the depth of feeling and emotion that comes with such experiences. However, I think that when it comes to detailing specific events, poetry has the downside of being overly open to interpretation and scant on detail. Both journalistic accounts and poetry have different pros and cons when it comes to authentic expression.
ReplyDelete